"

Introduction to the Spirochaetes

Spirochaetes are fine, helically-coiled, bacteria. They have flagella (axial filaments) that attach in the cell membrane and run between in inner (peptidoglycan layer) and outer membrane (LPS layer in Leptospira and Brachyspira, but not Borrelia) which allows them to move in a cork-screw fashion and enables them to move through viscous fluids such as mucus. These bacteria are only found in moist environments as they are very susceptible to desiccation and pH extremes. Dark-field or fluorescent microscopy is used to visualise these very thin, strand-like bacteria.

 

Phylogenetic relationships of the spirochaetes. The most important spirochaete to learn and an important disease to learn is leptospirosis
Phylogenetic relationships of the spirochaetes. The most important spirochaete to learn and an important disease to learn is leptospirosis

Learning Objectives

  1. Name the clinically important genera of the spirochaetes and list the important diseases caused by pathogens of this family in domesticated animals and selected wildlife
  2. Describe the morphology of Leptospira and explain how this relates to its epidemiological cycle including survival in the environment, transmission and invasiveness.
  3. Explain what is meant by accidental and maintenance hosts and how this relates to pathogenic Leptospira serovars.
  4. Outline the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira and how this relates to clinical signs and pathology
  5. Critically evaluate the current diagnostic tests available for Leptospira.
  6. Outline the control of leptospirosis in cattle, pigs and dogs
  7. Outline the pathogenic mechanisms in swine dysentery and compare it to spirochaetal diarrhoea of pigs

diseases caused by the spirochaetes

Whilst the spirochaetes are common in watery environments only a few cause disease. In animals the most important disease caused by this group is leptospirosis.

Below is a Table listing the  of diseases in animals caused by the spirochaetes.

Refer to the chapter on vector-borne bacterial diseases for those diseases in the list transmitted by ticks. Contagious ovine digital dermatitis is discussed in the chapter on infectious foot disease and necrobacillosis.

Diseases in animals caused by the spirochaetes. Those is bold are the more common diseases.
Diseases in animals caused by the spirochaetes. Those is bold are the more common diseases.

Leptospirosis

Leptospirosis is a global, contagious, multisystemic disease of animals, including humans caused by pathogenic members of the aerobic spirochaete Leptospira. It infects all mammals but  very few exhibit clinical signs of disease. It is a ZOONOSIS and notifiable in people, NOT animals It is an important disease of the Tropics in cattle, pigs and dogs. Outbreaks of leptospirosis are often associated with heavy rainfall and flooding.

To find out more on Leptospirosis:

  1. Ellis W.A. (2015) Animal Leptospirosis. In: Adler B. (eds) Leptospira and Leptospirosis. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol 387. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
  2. Sykes, JE, Hartmann K, Lunn KF, Moore GE, Stoddard RA, Goldstein RE (2010) 2010 ACVIM Small Animal Consensus Statement on Leptospirosis: Diagnosis, Epidemiology, Treatment, and Prevention. Journal of Internal Veterinary Medicine:, 25: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0654.x

Morphology of Leptospira

Learning Objective

Describe the morphology of Leptospira and explain how this relates to its epidemiological cycle including survival in the environment, transmission and invasiveness

Leptospires are obligate aerobes with an optimum growth temperature of 28 – 30°C. They cannot tolerate desiccation (drying out) nor will they survive temperatures <18°C or >40°C. This means that they can survive for up to 6 months in fresh waters that are warm and slightly alkaline.  They survive for a much shorter period in drier soils. Evidence suggests that pathogenic leptospires are found in riverbank soils and soil sediment where they form biofilms. Thus heavy rainfall and flooding can flush leptospires in soil and urine into freshwater. Cases in temperate climates are more sporadic and are often associated with a unique epidemiology i.e. venereal transmission or urine splashing in crowded barns or pens. An increase in rodent numbers (maintenance hosts) can also lead to increase in the number of cases.

Leptospires have a typical spirochaete shape with hooked ends this allows them to attach to mucosal surfaces and use their corkscrew-like motility to bore themselves through the mucosa.  This means that the leptospires can enter the host by any route. However, the most common routes of entry are the mucosae of the mouth, nasal cavity, eye and external genitalia. Direct transmission is by urine splashes, venereal, contact with aborted foetuses and placental material, animal bites and infected milk. Leptospires eliminated in the urine of carrier animals contaminates freshwater bodies where it crosses all mucosae as well as abraded or water softened skin.

Leptospira morphology and function. Picture A: Silver staining of leptospires present in the renal tubules; B: Picture of post digging tool showing morphological resemblance to Leptospira. Picture C; diagram of a leptospire shoing the central axial filment and the spiraling of the bacteria around it. This morphology allows the bacterium to move forward in a circular movement allowing it to penetrate mucus and even through epithelia.
Leptospira morphology and function. Picture A: Silver staining of leptospires present in the renal tubules; Picture B: Post digging tool showing morphological resemblance to Leptospira, indicating that this morphological structure is a powerful tool to move through difficult surfaces. Picture C; diagram of a leptospire shoing the central axial filament and the spiraling of the bacteria around it. This morphology allows the bacterium to move forward in a circular movement allowing it to penetrate mucus and even through epithelia. Image on the left from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved. Image on the right, author unknown. All Rights Reserved. Contact the JCU Library OER team if you know the author.

Carrier animals

Learning Objective

Explain what is meant by accidental and maintenance hosts and how this relates to pathogenic Leptospira serovars.

Leptospires are maintained in the proximal tubules of the kidneys of apparently healthy mammals, so-called “maintenance hosts” (see Table below) and shed intermittently into the urine. These are usually immune animals where the immune system tolerates the bacterium in certain body sites such as the proximal tubules of the kidneys and eyes. Non-immune maintenance hosts tend to show mild or chronic disease.

It is only when non-host adapted serovars of Leptospira infect “accidental hosts” that serious disease occurs. These people and animals are only temporary carriers of these leptospires.

The agglutinating surface antigens of pathogenic leptospires classify into 24 serogroups and over 250 serovars. Serogroups are not cross-reactive, but serovars within a serogroup can be. Pathogenic serovars distribute into 20 genomospecies where most infections are associated with Leptospira interrogans and Leptospira borgpetersenii. Interestingly, L. interrogans can survive in low nutrient conditions, whereas L. borgpetersenii does not.

Below is a Table showing some of the more common Leptospira serovars and their maintenance hosts in Australia.

Reported serovar distribution in people, dog and cattle in Australia
Reported distribution of the common serovars detected in people, dog and cattle in Australia. Leptospirosis is a rnotifiable disease in people. Thus the distribution of the infecting serovars are better known. In animals it is not notifiable and thus only published research will provide these figures.

Serovar distribution is geographical.  In Australia, disease is recognised in cattle (serovars Hardjo, Pomona and Zanoni), pigs (Pomona, Tarassovi and Bratislava), sheep (Hardjo), horses (Pomona), dogs (Copenhageni, Australis, Hardjo), and humans (mainly Arborea, Zanoni, Hardjo and Australis).   Although antibodies have been detected in snakes and some serovars in frogs their role in disease is unknown. Interestingly, leptospirosis has been recognised in pinnipeds off the Californian coast even though the marine environment is unlikely to support the bacterium.

Pathogenesis of leptospirosis

Learning Objective

Outline the pathogenic mechanisms of Leptospira and how this relates to clinical signs and pathology

Leptospires invade the body through the intact mucous membranes of the eye, upper respiratory and oropharyngeal cavities and urogenital tract as well as broken or water softened skin. Whilst not fully understand, leptospires use outer membrane proteins to attach to cell surfaces before they invade. They are able to resist Complement-mediated lysis by cleaving Complement or stimulating the regulatory enzymes used to moderate the activation of Complement. Bacteraemia is present and lasts until antibodies develop, usually for up to 7 days. Initially the leptospires will localise in the liver and after a short secondary bacteraemia, they localise in other organs, especially the eye, kidney, placenta and udder. Long-term survival of leptospires is usually in tissues that have a lowered immune response i.e. immune privileged sites. The lesions in tissue result from endothelial damage to the capillary beds resulting in ischaemic necrosis.  Focal areas of necrosis may be replaced by fibrous tissue observed as white spots i.e. “white spotted kidney”.  Virulence factors have not been properly studied but sphingomyelinases – porins, surface LigA and LigB proteins, surface lipoprotein LipL32 place a role in cell adherence and invasion. Humoral immunity directed to leptospiral LPS is protective in most species. Cattle are unusual in that immunity is TH1 with gamma-interferon release.

Below is a diagrammatic representation of the pathogenesis of leptospirosis

Pathogenesis of leptospirosis. Accidental hosts and foetuses suffer from the peracute (intravascular haemolysis) and acute forms (liver and renal disease) of the disease, whereas maintenace hosts mild or chronic disease (abortions, eye, chronic renal disease).
Pathogenesis of leptospirosis. Accidental hosts and foetuses suffer from the peracute (intravascular haemolysis) and acute forms (liver and renal disease) of the disease, whereas maintenance hosts mild or chronic disease (abortions, eye, chronic renal disease). Top image, author unknown. All Rights Reserved. Contact the JCU Library OER team if you know the author. Other images from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Clinical signs of leptospirosis

Most infected animals show no or mild signs of disease. The incubation period is 2 to 20 days, although it is longer for the chronic form. Clinical signs are associated with the lesion site.

Peracute disease

The peracute form, occurs in the bacteraemic stage of the disease and is more common in foetuses, neonatal animals and highly susceptible dogs. It manifests as intravascular haemorrhage with petechiation and haemoglobinuria.

Evidence of peracute leptospirosis showing intravascular haemolysis in a piglet and a pig foetus. The arrows point to skin petechiae in the neonate. Red petechiae are present on the skin of the pig foetus and as dark red ecchymoses in the lungs of a pig foetus. People can also get the peracute form of leptospirosis known as Weil's disease. However, it is rare.
Evidence of peracute leptospirosis showing intravascular haemolysis in a piglet and a pig foetus. The arrows point to skin petechiae in the neonate. Red petechiae are present on the skin of the pig foetus and as dark red ecchymoses in the lungs of a pig foetus. People can also get the peracute form of leptospirosis known as Weil’s disease. However, it is rare. Image from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Acute disease

The acute form manifests as acute liver and/or renal failure. In dogs, the acute form is most recognised where dogs present with fever, icterus (yellow gums), vomiting, diarrhoea and uraemia. Haemorrhages, DIC and death occur in some dogs. This form also occurs in people.

Chronic disease

The chronic form of the disease is the most common in animals with abortions, stillbirths and weak neonates being the most common clinical evidence of disease in ruminants, pigs and horses. In cattle a drop in milk production due to an infected udder results in the so-called “flabby udder”. In horses, equine recurrent uveitis (ERU), periodic opthalmia, or “moon blindness” is recognised. Associated with Leptospira infections of the eye, ERU, an autoimmune inflammatory disease results in recurrent bouts of blindness where the eye appears cloudy. Eventually, it will lead to permanent blindness in the affected eye. All animals, but especially dogs, develop chronic interstitial nephritis (CIN).

From the upper left: Abortion in a goat: placentitis with foetal maceration in a cow; Chronic interstitial nephritis in a dog x2, and equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) in a horse. All manifestations of chronic leptospirosis.
From the upper left: Abortion in a goat; placentitis with foetal maceration in a cow; Chronic interstitial nephritis in a dog x2, and equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) in a horse. All manifestations of chronic leptospirosis. Image from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Leptospirosis in people

Leptospirosis in humans is usually an occupational or recreational zoonosis affecting those working in the agricultural sectors (livestock, sugar and rice farming) and those involved with aquatic sports. Massive outbreaks occur post-flooding especially in tropical countries where socio-economic conditions are poor and rats are allowed to proliferate. In humans, most infections tend to be mild with symptoms of headache, fever, chills, sweats and myalgia (muscle pain).  Some highly pathogenic serovars may cause pulmonary haemorrhaging or renal and liver failure (Weil’s disease) which can result in death. 

Diagnosis of leptospirosis

Note that the case history, including epidemiological indicators, and clinical signs of leptospirosis in animals would ensure that leptospirosis is included in the differential diagnoses list.  A thorough disease investigation is necessary to confirm a diagnosis.

Detection of organism

  • Blood and organ biopsies in acute disease and urine,
  • Foetal fluids and membranes, and aqueous fluid of the eye in chronic disease

to be submitted for qPCR or culture. Culture can take up to 2 months and sample contamination makes the isolation of leptospires difficult.

Spirochaetes can be observed in the tissue of recently dead animals using a Silver staining method. However, the leptospires decompose rapidly in deceased animals. Thus qPCR that detects the lipL32 surface encoding gene in all pathogenic leptospires remains the most reliable diagnostic technique, especially when diagnosing peracute and acute leptospirosis.

The presence of leptospires on dark field microscopy in the urine andin stained sections of proximal tubules of the kidney: silver staining in the middle picture and antigen specific immunoperoxidase test on the right.
Left: The presence of leptospires on dark field microscopy in the urine and in stained sections of proximal tubules of the kidney: Middle: silver staining in the middle picture. Right: antigen specific immunoperoxidase test on the right. Image from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Detection of antibodies

Antibody detection on serum or clotted blood using either an ELISA for Leptospira genus or microscopic agglutination test (MAT) for serogroups (cross-reactions occurs in serovars within a serogroup) is the most common means of diagnosis. In acute infections a 4-fold rise in antibody titre demonstrates that the infection is recent. This is not the case in chronic infections, where the antibody titre may be high at the time of clinical disease. A lateral flow assay is available to detect antibodies to Leptospira in dogs. This is the most common way leptospirosis is diagnosed in dogs.

control including treatment of leptospirosis

Learning Objective

Outline the control of leptospirosis in cattle, pigs and dogs

  • Antibiotic therapy and supportive therapy is used to treat leptospirosis in companion animals
  • Annual vaccination with a bacterin vaccine for high risk animals (see below)
  • Good rodent control and make sure that there is no feed accessible that is attractive to rodents and other wildlife
  • Avoid swimming in and drinking from stagnant, freshwater pools during the warm summer months
  • Purchase livestock from farms with an animal health statement
  • Good biosecurity plan on farms focusing on animal purchasing and movement policies
  • The urine of sick and carrier animals and the birth fluids of infected animals are rich in leptospires. Wear gloves and clean up urine with disinfectants. Exposure of outdoor areas to sunlight and allowing water to drain away will kill the bacteria.

Available bacterin vaccines in Australia (no need to learn vaccine names, just for what species and when)

Pigs

  • Lepto-Eryvac® Zoetis pig vaccine against Leptospira Pomona and Tarassovi & Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae. Vaccinated at 4 weeks of age, booster 4 weeks later and thereafter every 6 months.
  • PLEvac® MSD Against L. Pomona and porcine parvovirus
  • ECOvacLE®  MSD Against L. Pomona, E. coli and E. rhusiopathiae

Cattle

  • Leptoshield® Zoetis for cattle against L.Hardjo, L.Pomona in calves from 4 weeks of age, a booster 1 month later and thereafter annually.
  • Ultravac® 7in1 Zoetis vaccine for cattle against clostridial diseases and L.Hardjo, L.Pomona in calves from 6 weeks of age, a booster 1 month later and thereafter annually.
  • Cattlevax LC 7 in 1 Coopers vaccine for cattle against clostridial diseases and L.Hardjo, L.Pomona in calves from 6 weeks of age, a booster 1 month later and thereafter annually.
  • WEBSTERS® 7 IN 1 VACCINE Virbac  for cattle against clostridial diseases and L.Hardjo, L.Pomona in calves from 6 weeks of age, a booster 1 month later and thereafter annually.

Dogs

  • Protech® C2i   Boehringer Ingelheim virulent canine coronavirus,  bacterins from Leptospira interrogans serovar Copenhageni. Non-core vaccine.

Dysentery in pigs caused by Brachyspira species

Introduction

Learning Objective

Outline the pathogenic mechanisms in swine dysentery and compare it to spirochaetal diarrhoea of pigs

Brachyspira species are short, obligate anaerobic spirochaetes that produce beta-haemolytic colonies on blood agar. They are usually the cause of large intestinal tract disease. The most important species in animals are:

  1. Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, the cause of swine dysentery
  2. Brachyspira pilosicoli the cause in intestinal spirochaetosis in a variety of animals including pigs (porcine colonic spirochaetosis) and poultry (avian intestinal spirochaetosis). B. pilosicoli can also cause zoonotic intestinal disease in humans where dogs and rodents are considered to be the source of the agent. Transmission of this genus is faecal-oral.
  3. Brachyspira avinipulli is the cause of avian intestinal spirochaetosis, a disease of stressed birds resulting in wet faeces that stains eggs, lethagy and drop in egg production.
  4. Brachyspira hampsonii and B. suanatina have been recognised in Europe as causing swine dysentery like disease. Birds are the carriers of these bacteria

Swine Dysentery (Cow pad diarrhoea)

Brachyspira hyodysenteriae causes a typhlocolitis known as swine dysentery (mucohaemorrhagic diarrhoea) in mainly grower to finisher pigs (12 to 75kg). The disease is global but is usually less severe or absent in immune herds or in countries where antibiotic performance enhancers are used. It is an important enteric disease of commercial pigs in Australia.

The disease is usually introduced into a herd by carrier pigs i.e. gilts and is then spread via faecal contamination of boots, feed pipes, flies etc. Rodents and birds are also known to carry the Brachyspira in their faeces.

After ingestion, the incubation period is one to two weeks with slow spread in a pig herd until it affects 90% to 100% of the herd. The organism colonises the mucosa of the proximal large intestine, multiplies in the crypts, damages or disrupts the epithelial cells with its haemolysins. It also stimulates an increase in the number of goblet cells as well as intestinal hyperplasia. Inflammation results in loss of tissue and blood, and the colonic epithelium fails to re-absorb chloride and sodium ions. Initially sloppy diarrhoea develops that is light brown with jelly-like mucus in it, and the pig reduces in appetite and weight. Later blood and necrotic tissue that looks like rice-grains is present in the stool and the pig may become severely dehydrated and die. Due to the stunting of the pigs, it can take 30 days longer for these pigs to reach market weight. Overcrowding, poor sanitation and stress in the pigs contribute to the spread and severity of disease.

Serum antibody develops within 7-10 days. Local lesions persist for 40-50 days after clinical recovery and animals remain carriers for up to 90 days.

Pathogenesis of swine dysentery showing the correlation of the pathology with clinical signs
Pathogenesis of swine dysentery showing the correlation of the pathology with clinical signs. Images from the collection of the University of Pretoria (except the top right image, by the author) used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Post-mortem findings are usually quite clear, although the disease can be confused with Lawsonia intracellularis infection (proliferative enteritis); intestinal spirochaetosis, salmonellosis, Trichuris (whipworm) infestation and gastric ulcers.

The mucosa of the large intestine is oedematous and congested, thickened (folded) and is often covered with a fibrinous diptheritic membrane (fibrinohaemorrhagic typhlocolitis).

Pathology of swine dysentery, showing proliferation in the intestinal mucosa, swelling and thickening of the intestinal mucosa and in the left and right pictures the preence of a diptheritic membrane.
Pathology of swine dysentery, showing proliferation in the intestinal mucosa, swelling and thickening of the intestinal mucosa and in the left and middle pictures. The left bottom and right pictures show the presence of a diptheritic membrane. Image from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

Histologically, epithelial hyperplasia is a feature. A crystal violet stained smear of the mucosa of the proximal large intestine will reveal numerous fine, spirochaetes. Silver staining of histological sections of recently dead animals will reveal numerous thread-like organisms in the intestinal crypts.

Histopathology: Intestinal hyperplasia and increased goblet cells are noted in the H&E stains on the left of the large intestine. On the right the silver stain shows up the very fine thread-like spirochaete, Brachyspira within the intestinal crypts.
Histopathology: Intestinal hyperplasia and increased goblet cells are noted in the H&E stains on the left of the large intestine. On the right the silver stain shows up the very fine thread-like spirochaete, Brachyspira within the intestinal crypts.

Samples of the affected intestine are collected for anaerobic bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Identification of the bacteria can be done using a species specific qPCR.

Gram's stain of a Brachyspira culture
Gram’s stain of a Brachyspira culture showing thin gram-negative curving filaments

The disease is usually treated using antibiotic medication of drinking water with bacitracin, lincomycin or the macrolides – tylosin, tiamulin, valnemulin or aivlosin are used.  Carbadox or monensin is used in countries where they are registered. However, antimicrobial resistance is common and therefore it may be necessary to test for antibiotic susceptibility.

Further control measures include rodent control, antibiotic treatment of carrier pigs and good farm sanitation and taking measures to avoid spread between pens (slatted floors, solid partitions, disinfectant pans, all-in-all-out). Avoid reusing untreated waste water.

Eradication of the agent has been done by early weaning at 3 weeks of age and transportation of the piglets to a clean site. Destocking by selling all the other pigs and then repopulate after disinfection of the pens using these pigs.  Complete depopulation can also be done with repopulation, by Brachyspira-free pigs in clean disinfected quarters.

To date vaccination has been unsuccessful.

Subcutaneous infections caused by the Spirochaetes

The skin diseases shown below are rare, so will not be tested.

Bovine digital dermatitis (BDD) (hairy warts) is a severe infectious cause of lameness with lesions at the horn junction at the back of the foot near the interdigital area which has spread through dairy cattle populations worldwide, causing serious welfare and agricultural problems. An erosive and proliferative form occurs. Treponema species together with other mixed bacterial infections originating from slurry have been implicated as the cause. Treatment involves cleaning the foot and using tetracycline footbaths, sprays or dressings. Improvement in environmental hygiene is also necessary. Note that “Ovine digital dermatitis” which is common in the UK (see notes on ovine footrot) is caused by  a variety of Treponema species.

Ulcerative  granuloma is a rare granulomatous skin disease in pigs is caused by an uncharacterised spirochaete together with secondary infections with other bacteria including streptococci and staphylococci. The bacteria enter via wound contamination and cause severe localised inflammation and the development of fibrous tissue. Control involves improving hygiene, reducing trauma and identifying the areas within the management system where infection first starts and making changes to these. Infected pigs can be treated with penicillin, tiamulin or lincomycin.

Ulcerative spirochaetosis in pigs with the upper pictures showing severe swelling of the forelimbs, the lower pictures showing ulceration of a forelimb and mouth respectively
Ulcerative spirochaetosis in pigs with the upper pictures showing severe swelling of the forelimbs, the lower pictures showing ulceration of a forelimb and mouth respectively. Images from the collection of the University of Pretoria, used with permission. All Rights Reserved.

 

END OF CHAPTER

 

definition

License

Bacterial and Fungal Diseases of Animals Copyright © by Jackie Picard. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book