13.5 Documentation Frameworks
Tanya Langtree and Elspeth Wood
Several methods of documentation are used to organise a nurse’s or midwife’s progress notes. Decisions about which method or framework you use may depend on the facility’s policy and procedural guidelines for documentation. Otherwise, it is a matter of personal preference.
In this section, four documentation frameworks are presented: charting by exception, narrative, problem-focused, and systems-based documentation. Another method that is sometimes used to inform documentation is ISBAR (Identification/Introduction, Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation), however, this framework is typically used for verbal communication such as handover.
Charting by Exception
Charting by exception (CBE) may be used in some healthcare facilities, particularly when a clinical (care) pathway or care plan has been implemented to inform and guide the care provided to the person. With CBE, the length and duplication of information are reduced as the healthcare team will follow a pre-determined treatment plan (i.e., a clinical pathway). While a health professional may need to make small notations about some aspects of care (e.g., ticking, initialling and dating when a specific assessment or intervention has occurred), the health professional will only expand on their documentation when a variation in the anticipated findings, routine care or care outcomes transpire. For example, the anticipated finding for a post-surgical pathway may be no signs of wound infection. If the person’s postoperative wound showed no signs of infection during the dressing change, the nurse who was using a CBE approach would indicate the wound care was performed on the pathway but there would be no need for them to provide additional information about the appearance of the wound on the post-operative surgical pathway or progress notes. In contrast, if the nurse found signs of a possible wound infection they would need to make additional notes in the person’s health record to describe their observations of the wound. For example, indicating whether the wound is exhibiting signs of infection such as redness, swelling, and/or purulent discharge.
Narrative Documentation
Narrative documentation uses a chronological approach whereby information is documented in a storied format and sequential order. For example, you would document when the person’s symptoms first started, what interventions were initiated and why, and how the person responded to these interventions. A storied format involves attending to ‘the what,’ ‘when,’ ‘who,’ and ‘how’ of the event that you are documenting such as describing what happened when it happened, who was involved, how the person responded and so forth. For example: ‘Joan is an 8-year-old girl who fell off her bike while riding with her mother, Jessica, to the corner store. Jessica reports Joan experienced a loss of consciousness for approximately 10 seconds and was confused when she awoke. Joan then voiced to Jessica “I have a sore head, Mummy” within 20 minutes of the fall. Jessica brought Joan to the emergency department within 40 minutes of the fall.’ As you can see, this example is both chronological and storied. Traditional narrative style documentation must also include any change in the person’s condition and their response to the treatment or care provided.
Problem-Focused Documentation
Problem-focused documentation uses the nursing process (or the process of woman-centred care) to inform the nurse or midwives’ reporting of patient care delivery and outcomes. Using this approach, the nurse focuses on the person’s issue/concern/problem including describing what assessment data was collected to evidence this problem. The nurse will then outline the plan of care that was used to address the problem and the evaluation criteria used to assess the care plan’s effectiveness. Several mnemonics can be used to inform this documentation style:
- Focus charting or DAR (data, action, response) or DAE (data, action, evaluation)
- AIR (assessment, intervention, response)
- APIE (assessment, plan, intervention, evaluation)
- SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, plan) and its derivatives including:
- SOAPIE (subjective, objective, assessment, plan, intervention, evaluation)
- SOAPIER (subjective, objective, assessment, plan, intervention, evaluation, revision)
Table 13.5.1 presents an overview of each of these frameworks.
Framework | Main characteristics |
DAR | Data: Objective and subjective assessment data that describe the focal area are identified.
Action: The immediate and future nursing/midwifery actions/interventions that will address the area of concern are described. Response: Outlines the person’s response to the care provided. |
APIE | Assessment: The subjective and objective assessment data are summarised and issues are identified.
Plan: The formulated plan of care based on this data is outlined including presenting the goals that have been developed with the person. Implementation: Describes the specific measures taken to facilitate the person in reaching their goal(s). Evaluation: Outlines the effectiveness of the implemented interventions including the person’s response. |
AIR | Assessment: The subjective and objective assessment data are summarised and issues are identified.
Intervention: A summary of the nursing/midwifery actions in response to the assessment data are described. Response: Outlines the effectiveness of the implemented interventions including the person’s response. |
SOAPIER | Subjective: Any information that is stated by the person or their family (e.g., “My leg is very sore around the wound”).
Objective: Data that is measured or observed by the healthcare team (e.g., The skin surrounding the wound is red, hot to touch, and swollen). Assessment: Conclusions are drawn based on the subjective and objective data collected. (e.g., Impaired comfort related to inflammation of the tissue secondary to injury). Plan: Details the strategies employed to alleviate the person’s problem. It may include both short- and long-term goals. Interventions: Describes the specific measures taken to facilitate the person in reaching their goal(s). Evaluation: Outlines the effectiveness of the implemented interventions including the person’s response. Revision: This step involves modifying or updating interventions if the original interventions were not fully effective. |
Systems-Based Documentation
Systems-based documentation uses a framework where information related to the person’s current concerns and related assessment data is recorded against each specific body system. The body systems typically reported include the central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular system (CVS), respiratory system (Resp), gastrointestinal system (GIT), metabolic, genitourinary (GUT), integumentary (Skin), musculoskeletal (MSK). The person’s experience of pain and its management may be reported under CNS or the affected body system.
Important Note
Check the policy and/or procedure of the facility that you are working in to ascertain their preference for documenting and follow these guidelines while you are attending placement or working in this healthcare facility.
Chapter Attribution
Content adapted, with editorial changes, from:
Langtree, T., & Wood, E. (2022). Documentation in nursing and midwifery: Australian edition. James Cook University. https://jcu.pressbooks.pub/nursingdocumentation. Used under a CC BY-NC 4.0 licence.